Built as working context, not shelfware.
This resource is meant to be useful inside the tools where product work now happens: your codebase, your notes, and your AI-assisted workflow.
01
Paste the markdown into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Codex, Gemini, or another AI agent as reusable project context.
02
Use it before a planning, implementation, review, or audit session so the agent has constraints, criteria, and working structure up front.
03
Adapt the sections to your product, team, or repo before asking the agent to execute against it.
Markdown previewai-feature-ux-checklist.md
# AI Feature UX Checklist Use this to audit an AI-powered product feature before it ships. ## 1. User Value - [ ] The feature solves a specific user problem. - [ ] AI is necessary or meaningfully improves the workflow. - [ ] The user can understand what the feature is doing. - [ ] The feature reduces effort without removing important user control. - [ ] The workflow still works when AI output is imperfect. ## 2. Inputs - [ ] Required inputs are clear. - [ ] Optional context is easy to provide. - [ ] The user knows what data will be used. - [ ] Sensitive data expectations are explicit. - [ ] Input examples are available when useful. - [ ] Bad or incomplete input produces a helpful response. ## 3. Output Quality - [ ] Output is structured for the next user action. - [ ] Uncertainty is visible when confidence is limited. - [ ] Sources or rationale are shown when decisions need trust. - [ ] The user can edit, regenerate, accept, reject, or undo. - [ ] The output avoids false precision. - [ ] The product avoids presenting generated content as verified fact. ## 4. Failure States - [ ] Slow responses have a clear loading state. - [ ] Model errors are recoverable. - [ ] Empty or low-quality responses explain what happened. - [ ] Rate limits or quota issues have clear messaging. - [ ] The user can continue manually. - [ ] The system avoids dead ends. ## 5. Trust And Safety - [ ] The feature states what it can and cannot do. - [ ] Risky outputs require review before action. - [ ] The user can inspect or correct important assumptions. - [ ] Personal, financial, legal, or health claims are treated carefully. - [ ] Generated recommendations are distinguishable from deterministic product logic. - [ ] Abuse cases and prompt injection paths have been considered. ## 6. Evaluation - [ ] The team has examples of good and bad outputs. - [ ] The team has a review process for regressions. - [ ] Success metrics are tied to user outcomes, not model usage alone. - [ ] Human feedback can be collected. - [ ] Logs capture enough context to debug safely. - [ ] The feature can be disabled or rolled back. ## 7. Interface Polish - [ ] Copy is direct and non-magical. - [ ] The UI does not overpromise. - [ ] Generated content is visually integrated with the workflow. - [ ] Review actions are close to the generated output. - [ ] The feature works on mobile and desktop. - [ ] Accessibility basics are covered for streaming, updates, and status messages.